ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Yelda Karincaoglu1, Ozlem Miman2, Bulent
Kalayci1, Ozlem Makbule Aycan2, Metin
Atambay2
1Inonu University School of Medicine, Department
of Dermatology and Venerelogy, 44315 Malatya - Turkey
2Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu
University, Malatya - Turkey
Demodex folliculorum (DF) is the most common ectoparasite of the
pilosebaceous unit [1]. We present a case of demodicosis which had
an atypical clinical manifestation at different localizations and
which was treated with systemic ivermectin.
A 36-year-old male patient presented at the dermatology clinic
complaining of acneiform lesions on the face, hairy skin and ear
auricles, and scale on the nasolabial folds and eyelashes for about
5 months. The patient, who did not have a photosensitivity history,
had marked itching in the lesions. These complaints had been
interpreted as acne vulgaris and seborrheic dermatitis and the
patient had been prescribed various topical and systemic
antibiotics from different groups, as well as topical steroids at
irregular intervals, and had used antibiotic eye drops and
ointments for his blepharitis. However, the patient had no benefit
from these treatments and reported occasional exacerbations of his
lesions. His dermatological examination showed many erythematous,
slightly bright, non-squamous acneiform papulopustules with a
diameter of 4 to 6 mm, which were located on the scalp,
earlobes and cheeks. There were also erythematous, mildly squamous
and inflammatory bilateral blepharitis signs, which were more
marked on lower eyelids (figure 1). The patient,
who did not have classical acne vulgaris, rosacea or seborrheic
dermatitis, was suspected clinically of having demodicosis and a DF
examination was performed. Samples collected from the forehead,
cheek, nose, chin and ear using standard surface skin biopsy showed
28, 18, 10, 15 and 15 DF per cm2, respectively and
samples collected from the eyelashes by depilation methods revealed
8-10 DF in a single follicle. The patient was prescribed 5%
permethrin topical cream twice a day, and 4% pilocarpine gel once
daily for blepharitis. After two weeks of treatment, the patient’s
blepharitis recovered completely clinically, while his face lesions
were unresponsive. Consequently, the patient was administered a
single-dose oral 200-250 μg/kg ivermectin. One month after
ivermectin administration, an almost complete remission was
observed in the lesions.
The classically involved areas are those with high sebum
production, like the forehead, cheek, nose, nasolabial folds, chin
and eyelids [1]. Our patient had hairy skin involvement, which has
previously been shown to be a rare localization, and auricle
involvement, which is unique in the literature. The parasite has
been shown in the external ear cerumen [2], but has never been
described as an auricle lesion. Recently there have been reports of
atypical demodicosis cases [3, 4]. Agents used to eradicate
infestations with demodex mites include topical metranidazole,
permethrin, lindane, sulfur, crotamiton, retinoids, selenium
sulfide, salicylic acid and benzyl benzoate [1]. In the treatment
of resistant or diffuse lesions, systemic treatments like
metranidazole, retinoids and ivermectin may be preferred [1, 5].
Routine use of 5% permethrin cream twice a day for 15 days is
reported to produce satisfactory results. In some cases, this
treatment is continued for one month in combination with 2%
salicylic acid cream [3].
Our case was initially treated with topical permethrin, but due
to irritation and the extensiveness of the lesions, systemic
ivermectin treatment was started. Use of 4% pilocarpine gel in
blepharitis of demodex origin has been reported to eliminate
symptoms and statistically significantly reduce the number of mites
before and after treatment [6]. Our case also responded very well
to topical pilocarpine for blepharitis. We think that pilocarpine
is a good alternative for chronic blepharitis associated with
demodicosis, and systemic ivermectin for diffuse facial lesions
unresponsive to topical treatments.
Acknowledgements
This paper was presented as poster at 17th EADV Congress, 17-21
September 2008, in Paris. Financial support: none. Conflict of
interest: none.
References
1 Baima B, Sticherling M. Demodicidosis revisited. Acta
Derm Venereol 2002; 82: 3-6.
2 Ding Y, Huang X. Investigation of external auditory
meatus secretion demodex folliculorum and demodex breuis infection
in college students. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 2005; 19:
176-7.
3 Karincaoglu Y, Bayram N, Aycan O,
Esrefoglu M. The clinical importance of Demodex folliculorum
presenting with nonspecific facial signs and symptoms. J Dermatol
2004; 31: 618-26.
4 Zomorodian K, Geramishoar M, Saadat F,
Tarazoie B, Norouzi M, Rezaie S. Facial demodicosis.
Eur J Dermatol 2004; 14: 121-2.
5 Doumishev AL, Dourmishev LA, Schwartz RA.
Ivermectin: pharmacology and application in dermatology. Int J
Dermatol 2005; 44: 981-8.
6 Fulk GW, Murphy B, Robins MD. Pilocarpine gel
for the treatment of demodicosis--a case series. Optom Vis Sci
1996; 73: 742-5.
|