Author(s) : Francesco Valenzano, Angelo Carbone, Clara De Simone, Teresa Sisto, Paolo Amerio, Guido Massi , Department of Dermatology, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy, Department of Dermatology, Gabriele D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy, Department of Dermopathology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. |
ARTICLE
Auteur(s) : Francesco Valenzano1,
Angelo Carbone1, Clara De Simone1, Teresa
Sisto1, Paolo Amerio2, Guido
Massi3
1Department of Dermatology, Policlinico A.
Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 8,
00168 Rome, Italy
2Department of Dermatology, Gabriele D’Annunzio
University, Chieti, Italy
3Department of Dermopathology, Catholic University
of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
In October 2006, a 45-year-old white female presented with
multiple nodular lesions which arose four weeks before our
observation, after summer sun exposure. Clinical examination showed
numerous erythematous and verrucous nodules of approximately
1 cm in diameter, centred by a horn-filled crater. These
lesions were diffused on the face, including the ears, neck, V-area
of trunk, upper limbs and back of hands (figure 1A) and they
appeared to be persistent. She did not report any acute reaction
after sunlight exposure. Clinical features were suggestive for
multiple keratoacanthomas. Histopathology of one of the lesions
showed a crateriform squamous neoplasm with a mature keratine plug.
At the base of the lesion, dyskeratotic cells and elastic fiber
extrusion were evident as seen in bono fide keratoacanthoma. In the
superficial dermis there was a lichenoid band infiltrate with
intraepidermal exocytosis (figure 1B). Diagnosis of
warts was excluded on the basis of the absence of the peculiar
papillated architecture of viral warts and the absence of
koilocytes and hyperplastic granular layers usually associated with
these viral-induced entities. Her familial history was negative for
multiple keratoacanthomas. Investigations performed to exclude
myelo- and lymphoproliferative disorders, malignancies or
immunodeficiency, which have, rarely, been described in association
with acquired multiple eruptive keratoacanthomas, gave negative
results. The patient refused any medical or surgical treatment and
was lost at follow-up until February 2007, when she presented
again. At that time some small, well-shaped, erythematous and
slightly hyperkeratotic papules were evident on the patient’s neck,
V-area of the trunk and shoulders, while the nodules diagnosed as
keratoacanthomas 4 months before were unchanged. A biopsy of
one of such lesion revealed features consistent for an interface
dermatitis with basal layer vacuolar alteration and lymphocyte
intraepidermal exocytosis. Although not specific, histological
features were considered to be consistant with a diagnosis of lupus
erythematosus (LE), which was confirmed by direct
immunofluorescence (DIF) findings and immune serological
abnormalities. DIF of a papule showed granular deposits of IgG, IgM
and C3 at the dermoepidermal junction. Analogous findings were also
observed on DIF of a keratoacanthoma-like lesion. Serum searches
revealed ANAs at low titer (1:160) and an increased titer of
anti-Ro(SS-A) antibodies (normal value < 25 IU/mL).
La(SS-B) and dsDNA antibodies were negative. UV-sensitivity-testing
was not performed because the patient denied consent. The first
skin biopsy was consequently re-evaluted in the search of signs for
LE but no specific criteria for LE were found. Oral treatment with
hydroxychloroquine 200 mg twice daily was therefore started
resulting in a progressive and full clearing of all the lesions,
also including the keratoachantoma-like ones, in two months. The
complete therapeutical response suggested a definitive diagnosis of
hypertrophic lupus erythematosus for all the cutaneous lesions.
A three month follow-up visit did not reveal any relapse.
It is well known that keratocanthomas and squamous cell
carcinomas may arise on chronic lesions of cutaneous lupus
erythematosus [1]. In addition some authors have reported
keratoacanthoma-like lesions accompanying classical features of
cutaneous lupus erythematosus [2-4] (table
1). In our case lupus erythematosus presented, as its first
manifestation, with clinical and histologic lesions resembling
keratoacanthomas. Therefore histopathology alone was not sufficient
to distinguish features of atypical lupus erythematosus from those
of keratoacanthomas. As recently reported in the literature,
differential diagnosis on histological grounds between lupus
erythematosus and squamous neoplasms can be very difficult, even
for experienced dermopathologists, since both clinical and
histological features can lead to a misinterpretation [5]. In
conclusion, from a practical point of view, our report shows that
in cases of multiple eruptive keratoacanthoma-like lesions, a
diagnosis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus should also be
considered.
Acknowledgements
Financial support: none. Conflict of interest: none.
References
1 Fanti PA, Tosti A, Peluso AM, Bonelli U.
Multiple keratoacanthoma in discoid lupus erythematosus. J Am Acad
Dermatol 1989; 21: 809-10.
2 Uitto J, Santa-Cruz DJ, Eisen AZ, Leone P.
Verrucous lesions in patients with discoid lupus erythematosus. Br
J Dermatol 1978; 98: 507-20.
3 Vassallo C, Brazzelli V, Ardigò M,
Barbagallo T, Borroni G. Multiple, keratoacanthoma-like
nodules on a 47-year-old man: a rare presentation of cutaneous
lupus erythematosus. Int J Dermatol 2003; 42: 950.
4 Cristofoletti Daldon PE, Macero de Souza E,
Cintra ML. Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus: a
clinicopathological study of 14 cases. J Cutan Pathol 2003; 30:
443.
5 Zedek DC, Smith Jr. ET, Hitchcock MG,
Feldman SR, Shelton BJ, White WL. Cutaneous lupus
erythematosus simulating squamous neoplasia: the clinicopathologic
conundrum and histopathologic pitfalls. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;
56: 1013-20.
|